Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Phase 2 GoReact Reflection Summary Reflection on Leadership and Team Formation During Phase 2 of developing my Advocacy Action Team, it became clear that intentional and strong leadership is fundamental to both the effectiveness and sustainability of a team. Building on the insights gained from Phase 1, the course activities and Continuing Professional Education (CPE) deepened my understanding of advocacy and the complexities of systems-level change. This phase highlighted the essential roles of collaboration, persistence, and strategic engagement in influencing health issues at the community and state levels. One key insight was that advocacy is inherently a collective endeavor rather than a solo effort. Successful advocacy depends on structured teamwork where leadership not only guides the team’s vision but also sustains motivation and accountability throughout the process. These experiences confirmed that leadership significantly affects team cohesion, drive, and the achievement of shared objectives. Importance of Interprofessional Team Structure A major learning point from this phase was the importance of deliberately selecting team members from diverse professional backgrounds. The task of identifying seven team-building strategies was challenging because many factors influence team success. Ultimately, the chosen strategies reflected key elements of collaboration, sustainability, and goal accomplishment within healthcare advocacy. Effective teams are marked by interprofessional diversity, incorporating members with different expertise, experiences, and perspectives. This diversity fosters innovative problem-solving and enhances decision-making. It also ensures that advocacy efforts are comprehensive and representative of the needs of varied populations and systems. Teams composed of varied professionals are better equipped to tackle complex healthcare challenges with nuanced approaches. Role of Leadership and Communication Leadership is critical for maintaining alignment and productivity within a team. A clearly designated leader is necessary to facilitate engagement, provide support, inspire team members, and keep activities aligned with the overall mission. Effective leaders promote psychological safety, encourage open participation, and model accountability—factors that boost overall team performance. Equally vital is the role of communication. Consistent, clear, and transparent communication fosters timely resolution of issues, reduces misunderstandings, and ensures all members share a common understanding of goals and expectations. Without strong communication, even well-structured teams risk losing cohesion and efficiency. Shared Purpose, Goal Setting, and Role Allocation A shared purpose serves as the cornerstone for any successful team. Defining a collective mission enables the team to set realistic, measurable goals that drive long-term advocacy efforts. Once goals are established, strategic planning is necessary to outline specific tasks and timelines. After defining goals, assigning roles based on individual strengths, expertise, and professional backgrounds is crucial. This strategic role allocation maximizes productivity and promotes higher engagement and accountability among members. When each person clearly understands their responsibilities and their contributions’ impact on the overall mission, team effectiveness is enhanced. Key Team-Building Strategies Identified The following table summarizes the seven primary team-building strategies identified as essential to the success of the Advocacy Action Team, including their purpose and how they contribute to team effectiveness: Team-Building Strategy Description Contribution to Team Success Interprofessional Diversity Inclusion of members from various healthcare disciplines Enhances collaboration and broadens perspectives Strong Leadership Designated leader to guide and support the team Maintains focus, motivation, and accountability Effective Communication Clear and consistent information sharing Promotes alignment and timely problem resolution Shared Purpose Unified mission and vision Aligns efforts toward common goals Strategic Planning Collaborative planning of tasks and goals Improves efficiency and goal attainment Defined Roles Assigning responsibilities based on strengths and expertise Maximizes individual contributions Mutual Accountability Shared responsibility for outcomes Strengthens trust and commitment Conclusion In conclusion, Phase 2 reinforced the critical role of structured teamwork, purposeful leadership, and intentional interprofessional collaboration in healthcare advocacy. The process underscored that driving meaningful change requires persistent effort, engagement from diverse professionals, and a clear organizational framework. These insights will guide my future professional endeavors by enhancing my capacity to lead, collaborate, and advocate within complex healthcare environments. References American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. AACN. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. IPEC. D025 Phase 2 Reflection: Insights on Team Leadership and Advocacy Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications. World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. WHO.

Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Phase 1 GoReact Reflection Summary Professional Growth Through Policy Advocacy Planning Participating in Phase 1 of the GoReact reflection and the related policy advocacy planning was a transformative experience that fostered substantial professional growth. This academic and continuing professional education (CPE) activity deepened my understanding of the critical role advanced practice nurses play in shaping health policy and advocating for systemic improvements. It underscored how healthcare providers can take an active stance in addressing broad public health issues, both within local communities and at the state level. The process helped me appreciate the nurse’s responsibility beyond direct patient care, positioning nurses as influential leaders capable of driving policy reforms. Insights Gained From the Policy Advocacy Planning Process The policy advocacy planning experience revealed the significance of proactive involvement in healthcare, shifting the focus from reactive treatment to preventive and strategic action. Unlike traditional academic tasks, this activity demanded critical thinking, comprehensive planning, and aligning personal motivations with public health priorities. It became evident that initiating meaningful change requires education, partnership, and ongoing advocacy efforts. Furthermore, it highlighted that nurses are not just caregivers but also pivotal change agents who can influence policies that directly impact population health outcomes. Reason for Selecting Obesity as the Policy Advocacy Focus Obesity was chosen as the primary health issue because of its high prevalence and its well-established link to numerous preventable chronic diseases. Current medical practice often concentrates on managing obesity-related conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, rather than emphasizing prevention. By addressing obesity early through education and lifestyle modifications, there is potential for significant reductions in long-term healthcare costs and enhancements in overall quality of life. This focus supports the urgent need to shift healthcare efforts toward prevention rather than solely treatment. The Role of Early Education in Preventing Obesity Introducing comprehensive nutrition and obesity prevention education within Kindergarten through 12th-grade curricula represents a foundational public health strategy. Early childhood and adolescence are critical periods for establishing lifelong behaviors. Delivering consistent, developmentally appropriate education during these years can foster healthy lifestyle habits, improve decision-making skills related to diet and exercise, and normalize wellness-oriented choices. Over time, this educational foundation can lead to decreased obesity rates and lower the incidence of related chronic conditions in the population. Challenges and Motivations During the CPE Activity This CPE activity proved to be more challenging compared to other coursework due to its demands for persistence, critical analysis, and strategic advocacy planning. Despite these difficulties, the experience was highly motivating and reinforced my dedication to health advocacy. The complexities encountered highlighted the intricate nature of policy change processes, while simultaneously strengthening my resolve to remain committed to advancing public health initiatives. The activity served as a reminder of the importance of resilience, sustained effort, and professional accountability in promoting health reforms. Initial Advocacy Efforts Undertaken Motivated by the insights gained from this course, I have begun advocacy actions by reaching out to two state policymakers via email. This initial communication introduced the concept of the proposed policy initiative focused on obesity prevention education. This outreach marks the first step in a long-term effort to influence public health and education policies. Moving forward, advancing this initiative will require continuous engagement with stakeholders, coalition-building, and utilizing evidence-based messaging to gain support and momentum for policy adoption. Summary of Key Advocacy Components Advocacy Component Description Identified Health Issue Obesity and related chronic diseases Target Population Children and adolescents (Kindergarten through 12th grade) Proposed Intervention Mandatory nutrition and obesity prevention education Advocacy Strategy Policy engagement and communication with state officials Professional Role Advanced practice nurse as an advocate and change agent Conclusion In conclusion, this reflection and policy advocacy planning experience was pivotal in fostering professional empowerment. The coursework emphasized the vital role advanced nursing professionals have in influencing health policy and championing preventive care initiatives. Although the pathway to policy reform is complex and demanding, the knowledge and skills acquired during this activity have strengthened my determination to pursue impactful changes that prioritize prevention, education, and improved population health outcomes. References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Childhood obesity facts. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html Institute of Medicine. (2012). Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: Solving the weight of the nation. National Academies Press. Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. D025: Phase 1 Reflection on Health Policy Advocacy Insights World Health Organization. (2021). Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Submission Guidelines What are the essential criteria for submitting the Clinical Practice Experience (CPE) record and e-portfolio for evaluation? To ensure your submission is accepted, it is essential that the work you present reflects originality. Specifically, no more than 30% of your content should consist of direct quotations or closely paraphrased material from other sources. Submissions must be uploaded as attachments in accepted file formats such as .docx, .pdf, or .ppt. Submitting through cloud-based links like Google Docs or OneDrive is not permitted. Furthermore, your work should closely follow the rubric provided, which clearly outlines the evaluation criteria for your submission. Requirement A: Clinical Practice Experience Record What must be included in the Clinical Practice Experience (CPE) Record submission? Your CPE Record must be submitted as a separate, completed, and signed document, distinct from your e-portfolio. This record should include: This ensures that the record is official and verifiable. Requirement B: E-Portfolio Deliverables What specific deliverables are required for the e-portfolio, and how should they be submitted? You are required to upload eleven distinct deliverables within your e-portfolio. These deliverables are categorized between Phase 1 and Phase 2 and must be accompanied by a functional “Share” link for evaluation. The details of each deliverable are summarized in the table below: Deliverable Description 1. CPE Schedule Table A comprehensive timeline detailing all your planned activities. 2. Advocacy Plan Summary A brief summary (200–300 words) highlighting the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) you identified. 3. SMART Goal A goal statement broken down into Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timely components, with one sentence per element. 4. Policymaker List Names and contact information of relevant policymakers involved in your advocacy efforts. 5. Phase 1 GoReact Screenshots One screenshot of your video and two showing your feedback on peer videos during Phase 1. 6. Phase 1 Reflection A written summary reflecting on your experiences during Phase 1. 7. Team-Building Strategies A list of seven distinct strategies employed to enhance teamwork. 8. Interprofessional Stakeholders A list of five key stakeholders from various disciplines. 9. Meeting Agenda Four agenda items prepared for the first advocacy action team meeting. 10. Phase 2 GoReact Screenshots One screenshot of your video and two screenshots of feedback you provided on peers’ videos from Phase 2. 11. Phase 2 Video Reflection A written summary reflecting on your experiences during Phase 2. All these items must be submitted within the e-portfolio and linked properly for evaluation. Evaluation Rubric How will the submissions be evaluated according to the rubric? The rubric assesses submissions in two main categories: the CPE Record and the E-Portfolio Deliverables. Each category is scored using a binary system—“Not Evident” or “Competent”—based on specific criteria summarized in the table below: Requirement Not Evident Description Competent Description CPE Record The attachment is missing, activities are undated or incomplete, or the form lacks a signature. The attachment is submitted with all activities dated and completed, including a signature. E-Portfolio One or more deliverables are missing, incomplete, or the provided link is non-functional. All eleven deliverables are complete, uploaded, and accompanied by a working evaluation link. Meeting these standards ensures the submission is considered competent and will be accepted for evaluation. D025 Task 1: Clinical Practice Experience References American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Policy Summary: (I)SBAR Summary Template When communicating policy changes, policymakers often depend on succinct summaries to quickly grasp the essentials and make informed decisions regarding their support. The (I)SBAR summary below captures the crucial elements of a policy proposal focused on addressing the opioid crisis in Cook County. Policymaker Information Policymaker’s Name J.B. Pritzker Policymaker’s Title Governor of Illinois (I) Identify Self My name is Corie Payne, and I bring four years of experience as a pediatric transitional and intensive care nurse at Maryville Children’s Healthcare Center in Chicago. This professional background equips me with a deep understanding of critical health issues affecting our community, particularly those involving vulnerable populations. (S) Situation What is the current health issue requiring attention? The pressing problem involves a significant increase in opioid-related overdoses and fatalities within Cook County. This escalating public health emergency necessitates immediate and focused interventions to mitigate harm and prevent further loss of life. (B) Background What are the relevant historical and contextual details about this issue? From April 2019 to April 2020, Cook County witnessed a dramatic 139% rise in opioid-related deaths. Despite ongoing efforts, existing prevention and treatment programs remain inadequate and do not sufficiently address the needs of individuals struggling with substance use disorders. Additionally, geographic challenges complicate access to care—some residents must travel up to 25 miles to reach the nearest support services, which delays timely intervention and exacerbates health risks. (A) Assessment What is the recommended course of action to tackle this problem? To bridge this critical service gap, I propose expanding opioid treatment and prevention initiatives within immediate care centers and hospitals throughout Cook County. This expansion should include comprehensive education on opioid risks alongside accessible detoxification and treatment options. Enhancing local availability of these resources is essential to decrease opioid-related harms and improve overall health outcomes in the community. References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Opioid overdose crisis. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html Illinois Department of Public Health. (2021). Substance use and opioid prevention programs. https://www.dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/prevention-wellness/substance-use D025 Task 1 ISBAR Summary Maryville Children’s Healthcare Center. (2024). Community health initiatives. Internal publication.

Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Advocating for Policy Change to Improve Community Health Outcomes Advocacy in nursing is the process of using education, professional expertise, and one’s role to champion the needs and rights of others. This skill is introduced early in nursing education and remains a central duty throughout a nurse’s career. While nurses are adept at advocating for individual patients in clinical settings—ensuring optimal treatment and care—the broader role of advocating for community health, especially in preventive care, is often underemphasized. Advanced professional nurses (APNs) have a unique and critical responsibility to advocate for systemic policy changes that enhance health outcomes across entire communities. Advanced Professional Nurse as Advocate How does advocacy differ between community populations and individual patients in clinical practice? The advocacy role of an APN varies significantly when focusing on a community population compared to an individual patient. These distinctions can be summarized as follows: Aspect Community Advocacy Clinical Practice Advocacy Level of Care Focus Preventive care via policy change Secondary and tertiary care for acute illness Collaborative Partners Local leaders and policymakers Interprofessional healthcare team (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, therapists) Scope of Impact Indirect impact on community health outcomes Direct impact on individual patient outcomes In community advocacy, APNs prioritize prevention by shaping policies that influence population health. In contrast, clinical advocacy emphasizes managing and treating individual health conditions. The community-focused approach requires collaboration with legislators and local stakeholders, while clinical advocacy is mainly an interdisciplinary effort within healthcare teams (Nickitas et al., 2018; Bondurant & Armstrong, 2016). Interprofessional Collaboration What strategies promote effective teamwork in community advocacy? Successful community advocacy hinges on a coordinated effort within an Advocacy Action Team (AAT), which includes professionals dedicated to supporting marginalized groups. Two key evidence-based strategies enhance interprofessional collaboration: These strategies strengthen team unity and help maintain momentum even in the face of opposition or challenges. Data-Driven Health Issue: Smoking in Winnebago County According to the 2021 County Health Rankings and Roadmaps, Winnebago County ranks among the least healthy counties in Illinois, primarily due to high adult smoking rates—21%, which exceeds both the state and national averages of 16%. Smoking among adults in this region represents a critical health issue demanding targeted intervention. Characteristics of the At-Risk Population Who comprises the population most vulnerable to smoking in Winnebago County, and how do they compare nationally? The most at-risk group consists predominantly of adults with lower educational attainment, a condition often linked to childhood socioeconomic factors. The following table compares key indicators between Winnebago County and national averages: Characteristic Winnebago County Data U.S. National Data High School Diploma Rate 88% of adults 94% of adults Some College Completion Rate 59% of adults 73% of adults Childhood Poverty Rate 27% of children 10% of children Lower educational attainment and higher childhood poverty rates are strongly correlated with increased adult smoking prevalence (Gagne, Frohlich, & Quesnel-Vallee, 2020). Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) Limited access to education during childhood, particularly among children living in poverty, is a significant social determinant influencing smoking rates in Winnebago County. According to Healthy People 2030 (n.d.), children raised in impoverished households face higher dropout rates, which correlate with greater risk of becoming smokers in adulthood. Thus, enhancing educational opportunities early in life is crucial to disrupting this cycle and improving long-term health outcomes. Current Policy and Its Limitations Winnebago County currently enforces a Tobacco Free and Smoke Free Environment Policy (2014) that restricts tobacco use indoors and near buildings, aligning with Illinois state laws. While this policy helps reduce secondhand smoke exposure, it falls short in addressing the underlying causes of adult smoking—specifically, the educational deficits linked to poverty that contribute to smoking initiation. Policy Proposal: Extended Early Childhood Program What policy intervention is proposed to address the root causes of smoking? To confront limited educational access, the proposed policy introduces an Extended Early Childhood Program aimed at meeting the socioeconomic and educational needs of children living in poverty. Research indicates that children from low socioeconomic backgrounds often need additional support to succeed academically and have lower graduation rates (Healthy People 2020, n.d.). This program would provide early educational interventions to increase graduation rates and, consequently, reduce adult smoking rates in the long run. Impact of the Policy on Health Outcomes Implementing the Extended Early Childhood Program is expected to yield multiple benefits, including: Evidence from programs like the Carolina Abecedarian Project supports the notion that early childhood education positively affects physical and mental health into adulthood and decreases smoking likelihood (Healthy People 2020, n.d.). Ensuring Equitable Distribution of Resources To guarantee fairness, the policy will incorporate a diversity clause prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. A diversity board will oversee admissions to ensure access is granted based on genuine need rather than favoritism. Unused spaces reserved for specific groups will be reallocated to those demonstrating the highest need. Ethical Considerations This policy initiative aligns with the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics provisions: Provision Description Provision 7.3 Nurses are obligated to engage in community advocacy and policy development (ANA, 2015). Provision 8.2 Nurses must address social determinants of health by collaborating with leaders and policymakers. By advocating for reforms that improve educational access, APNs fulfill their ethical responsibilities to promote community health equity (ANA, 2015). Potential Barriers What challenges might hinder policy implementation? Key obstacles include: Addressing these challenges requires strategic communication and partnership building with key stakeholders. Policy Maker Identification Jude Makulec, President of the Winnebago County School Board, is a critical policymaker for advancing the Extended Early Childhood Program. Given their influence over educational policies and connections with local leaders, Makulec holds significant sway to facilitate policy adoption. Strategic Next Steps for Advocacy To enhance advocacy effectiveness, an APN should: Conclusion Advanced professional nurses play a crucial role beyond individual patient care by engaging in community and policy advocacy to promote health equity. Through collaborative partnerships and targeted policy initiatives like

Student Name Western Governors University D025 Essentials of Advanced Nursing Roles and Interprofessional Practice Prof. Name Date Advanced Professional Nurse as Advocate Nurses are fundamental advocates for patients in diverse environments. Advocacy, as described by the American Nurses Association (ANA), is a core element of nursing practice. Nurses instinctively advocate not only for individual patients but also within their workplaces and communities (American Nurses Association [ANA], n.d.). The nature of advocacy varies depending on the context. Advanced professional nurses extend their advocacy beyond individual care to address broader community health concerns, especially for at-risk populations. They identify critical issues affecting these groups and develop tailored advocacy strategies. For example, in a community setting, these nurses utilize demographic and statistical data to inform and drive policy changes or program initiatives that benefit the entire vulnerable population. Conversely, clinical advocacy is more focused and individualized. In this setting, the nurse’s efforts center around enhancing the health outcomes of a single patient by considering their specific medical history and needs. Advocacy in clinical environments requires personalized strategies to improve treatment plans and promote the patient’s well-being. Interprofessional Collaboration As healthcare evolves, nurses take on pivotal roles such as policy development, care coordination, and implementation of healthcare improvements (Moss, Seifert, & O’Sullivan, 2016). For successful advocacy, advanced nurses must form an Advocacy Action Team (AAT) that relies on interprofessional collaboration. Interprofessional collaboration involves multiple health professionals working together with patients, families, and communities to ensure high-quality care (World Health Organization [WHO], 2017). Two essential strategies enhance collaboration within the AAT: Data-Driven Health Issue Solano County in California, home to over 400,000 residents across seven cities, is experiencing a troubling increase in sexually transmitted infections (STIs). From 2012 to 2015, STI cases rose by 13.3%, reaching 2,430 reported infections (Solano County Health, 2019). Gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis are the most common, with gonorrhea cases increasing by 95.5% between 2012 and 2016. These local trends reflect broader statewide increases of over 14% in STI rates during the same timeframe (Hansen, 2018). Characteristics of the At-Risk Population The demographic most vulnerable to STIs in Solano County includes young adults aged 20-24, followed by adolescents aged 13-19 (Hansen, 2018). There are significant racial disparities; African Americans are disproportionately affected, with infection rates for chlamydia four to five times higher and gonorrhea six to eleven times higher compared to non-Hispanic Whites (Solano County Health, 2016). Social Determinant of Health Access to quality healthcare is a crucial social determinant influencing elevated STI rates among at-risk groups. Many minorities, adolescents, and young adults face barriers such as high costs and limited provider availability, restricting their ability to receive preventive education, timely diagnosis, and treatment. Closing this healthcare gap is vital to reversing the rise in STI cases. Current Policy Currently, Solano County lacks targeted policies addressing the spike in STI rates among youth and minority populations. Existing initiatives are broad, aimed at enhancing healthcare access generally, but do not sufficiently tackle the specific needs of vulnerable subgroups. This gap highlights the necessity for focused policies addressing these unique community challenges. Policy Proposal The recommended policy integrates both treatment and education, focusing on middle and high school adolescents. Healthcare professionals would volunteer monthly to provide free STI screenings, prevention, and treatment services directly within schools. This strategy mitigates barriers related to cost and access by delivering care where adolescents spend much of their time. It also aligns with Healthy People 2030 goals to increase adolescent preventive healthcare visits (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). Health Issue Impact Education forms the backbone of this policy. School-based programs will educate students about STIs, symptoms, prevention, and treatment options. Early testing and diagnosis, as advocated by Dr. Matyas, are critical in reducing transmission through timely intervention (Hansen, 2018). Private healthcare provider consultations within the school setting encourage adolescent autonomy and trust, key elements for effective health promotion (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). Equitable Distribution of Resources The policy ensures resources are distributed equitably by targeting schools in both affluent and underserved areas. Recruiting healthcare volunteers from diverse backgrounds mirroring the community’s demographics further promotes engagement and trust, motivating adolescents to utilize the services. Ethical Provisions This policy aligns with the American Nurses Association’s Code of Ethics, particularly Provision 3, which obligates nurses to advocate for patient rights, health, and safety (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2016). It also supports Provision 8, emphasizing collaboration among healthcare professionals to promote equity and reduce disparities. Barriers Challenges to the policy include potential parental objections to STI education and treatment without explicit consent, which may limit adolescent participation. Additionally, school administration approval is crucial; resistance from school leaders could impede program rollout. Policy Makers Lizette Estrella-Henderson, the superintendent of Solano County schools, holds significant influence over this policy. As the key figure overseeing school funding, programming, and coordination, she can champion and facilitate the successful implementation of the initiative. Strategic Next Steps To strengthen professional nursing advocacy, care should be personalized to the adolescent age group, enhancing educational and health service effectiveness. Furthermore, pursuing certification as a Public Health Nurse would equip nurses with specialized expertise to tackle community health issues such as STIs more effectively. Comparison of Advocacy Approaches by Setting Advocacy Aspect Community Level Clinical Practice Setting Focus At-risk population in the community Individual patient Data Utilized Population statistics and trends Personal health history and medical details Advocacy Goals Policy change, program implementation Patient treatment and individualized care Scope Broad, affecting entire population Narrow, targeting individual patient needs Strategy Tailored to community needs and resources Personalized for specific health conditions References American Nurses Association – Advocacy. (n.d.). https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/advocacy/ American Nurses Association. (2016). Code of Ethics for Nurses. https://nursing.rutgers.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2019/06/ANA-Code-of-Ethics-for-Nurses.pdf Hansen, T. R. (2018, February 14). STD rates on the rise in Solano. Daily Republic. https://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-news/solano-news/solano-county/std-rates-on-the-rise-in-solano-state/ Healthy People 2030. (n.d.). Increase the proportion of adolescents who speak privately with a provider during preventive medical visits. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/adolescents/increase-proportion-adolescents-who-speak-privately-provider-preventive-medical-visit-ah-02 D025 Task 2 Advocating for Policy Change to Improve Health Outcomes in the Community Moss, E., Seifert, P., & O’Sullivan, A. (2016, September 30). Registered Nurses as Interprofessional Collaborative Partners: Creating Value-Based