PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 An Ethical Analysis of a Case Study
Student Name
Capella University
PSYC FPX 4900 Psychology Capstone Project
Prof. Name
Date
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 An Ethical Analysis of a Case Study
In the case of Adara and Hannah at Riverbend City High School, the most appropriate ethical response involves protecting Adara from foreseeable harm while respecting confidentiality, cultural identity, and the student-counselor relationship. Because Adara disclosed thoughts of self-harm, Hannah had an ethical responsibility to take reasonable steps to protect her safety. However, the situation also demonstrates why counselors should explain confidentiality limits in advance, assess the immediacy of risk, consider cultural factors, and disclose only the information necessary to protect the student. Addressing Adara’s experiences of bullying and cultural isolation should also be part of a comprehensive intervention plan.
Case Study Overview
The case involves Hannah, a 36-year-old African American high school guidance counselor, and Adara, a 15-year-old Muslim-American student at Riverbend City High School. Adara has been experiencing social isolation because she is the only Muslim-American student within her close group of friends. She has also experienced bullying at school and online, particularly related to her appearance and cultural identity.
Adara feels comfortable talking with Hannah about these experiences. However, she is reluctant to receive counseling outside of school because she does not want to seek additional services without her parents’ approval. During one counseling session, Adara reveals that she has experienced thoughts of self-harm.
Hannah responds by sharing the disclosure with Adara’s family. Although the disclosure was connected to a legitimate safety concern, it damages the trust that Adara had developed with Hannah. The case therefore raises important ethical questions about confidentiality, self-harm, bullying, cultural sensitivity, and the counselor’s responsibility to protect a minor from foreseeable harm.
Ethical Issues in Adara’s Case
Several ethical concerns must be considered when evaluating Hannah’s response. The most significant issues involve confidentiality, protection from harm, cultural competence, bullying prevention, and maintaining a supportive professional relationship.
A counselor generally has an obligation to protect information shared privately by a student. However, confidentiality is not unlimited, particularly when a student presents a serious and foreseeable risk of harm to herself or another person. For this reason, Hannah’s decision to seek help after Adara disclosed thoughts of self-harm can be ethically justified.
The way the disclosure was handled is equally important. Counselors should communicate confidentiality limitations to students before sensitive information is shared. When disclosure becomes necessary, the counselor should involve the student in the process whenever possible and limit the disclosure to information necessary to address the safety concern.
Cultural Sensitivity and Ethical Counseling
Cultural awareness is another important consideration in this case. Adara’s identity as a Muslim-American teenager may influence how she experiences bullying, family relationships, social isolation, counseling, and mental health services.
The American Psychological Association’s ethical standards emphasize respect for human dignity and recognize the importance of avoiding discrimination based on characteristics such as age, gender, religion, and cultural background. Hannah should therefore approach Adara’s situation without assumptions about her religion, family, or cultural practices.
Culturally responsive counseling could include learning more about Adara’s cultural background, asking open-ended questions about how her identity affects her experiences, and allowing Adara to explain what forms of support she considers acceptable. This approach can help the counselor provide appropriate support while strengthening the therapeutic relationship.
APA Ethical Principles Relevant to the Case
The APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct provide useful guidance for understanding the ethical dimensions of the case.
Principle E: Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity
General Principle E emphasizes respect for people’s rights, dignity, and worth. It also recognizes the importance of addressing factors such as culture, religion, gender, and other individual characteristics.
Applied to Adara’s situation, this principle means Hannah should recognize Adara as an individual with her own cultural experiences and perspectives. The counselor should avoid making assumptions about Adara’s Muslim identity and should consider cultural factors when developing an appropriate intervention.
Standard 4.05: Disclosures
APA Standard 4.05 addresses disclosures of confidential information. Ethical disclosure may be permitted when necessary to protect a client, patient, psychologist, or another person from harm.
Because Adara disclosed thoughts of self-harm, Hannah had a legitimate reason to become concerned about her safety. However, an ethical disclosure should be proportionate to the risk involved. Rather than broadly sharing confidential information, Hannah should disclose only what is necessary to obtain appropriate protection and support.
The counselor should also explain the reason for the disclosure to Adara when circumstances permit. Including Adara in the process may help preserve some of the trust established during counseling.
ASCA Ethical Standards and Student Safety
The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) Ethical Standards also provide important guidance for this situation. School counselors have responsibilities related to student welfare, confidentiality, student advocacy, and serious and foreseeable harm.
When a student communicates a credible risk of self-harm, a school counselor cannot simply maintain confidentiality without taking appropriate protective action. The counselor must evaluate the situation and follow applicable school policies, professional standards, and legal requirements.
At the same time, safety intervention should not end once information has been communicated to parents or school personnel. Adara should receive appropriate follow-up support, risk assessment, and access to mental health resources.
Why the Counselor’s Response Matters
Hannah’s response illustrates the difficult balance between confidentiality and safety. If Hannah had ignored Adara’s disclosure, she could have failed to respond appropriately to a potential risk of serious harm. Conversely, disclosing information without adequately involving Adara could damage the counseling relationship and discourage the student from seeking help in the future.
The goal should therefore be both protective and collaborative. Hannah could explain why she needs to involve others, ask Adara what she feels comfortable sharing, and work with her to identify trusted adults and appropriate mental health resources.
The counselor should also document the disclosure, assessment, consultation, interventions, and follow-up plan according to school policy and professional requirements.
Addressing Bullying and Cyberbullying
Adara’s bullying experiences should be treated as a significant component of the case rather than as an unrelated issue. Repeated bullying and cyberbullying can contribute to social isolation, emotional distress, anxiety, depression, and thoughts of self-harm.
Hannah should work with appropriate school personnel to address the bullying while protecting Adara from unnecessary exposure or retaliation. Depending on the circumstances, the intervention may involve school administrators, teachers, parents, mental health professionals, and other members of the student-support team.
An effective bullying intervention should focus on prevention as well as the immediate incident. Schools can strengthen prevention by educating students about respectful communication, cultural differences, online behavior, reporting procedures, and the consequences of harassment.
Alternative Ethical Approaches
A stronger approach would combine immediate safety intervention with ongoing support for Adara. Hannah could begin by conducting or arranging an appropriate risk assessment to determine the seriousness and immediacy of the self-harm concern.
If there is an immediate danger, emergency safety procedures should take priority. If the risk is not imminent, Hannah can still involve appropriate adults and professionals while explaining each step to Adara.
Another useful approach would be consultation with a qualified colleague or school mental health professional. Consultation can help Hannah evaluate the situation objectively without unnecessarily revealing identifying information. This is particularly useful when the counselor is uncertain about how to balance confidentiality, cultural considerations, and safety.
A Collaborative Intervention Plan
A comprehensive intervention plan could include several coordinated actions.
First, Hannah should prioritize Adara’s immediate safety and ensure that an appropriate risk assessment is completed. Second, the counselor should explain the limits of confidentiality and discuss why additional support may be necessary.
Third, Hannah should collaborate with Adara and her family, when appropriate, to identify professional mental health resources. Fourth, the school should investigate the reported bullying and cyberbullying according to established policies.
Finally, Adara should receive continued follow-up rather than being treated as though the problem has been resolved after the initial disclosure. Regular check-ins can help identify changes in emotional well-being and determine whether additional intervention is necessary.
Evidence Supporting Early Intervention
Research supports early intervention and comprehensive school-based approaches to bullying and mental health concerns. Laletas (2019) highlights the importance of ethical decision-making models that help school counselors respond to complex situations while considering professional responsibilities and student welfare.
Smith (2015) also emphasizes the ethical challenges associated with confidentiality when minors experience bullying and there is a potential risk of harm. These concerns demonstrate why counselors must carefully balance a student’s right to privacy with their responsibility to protect the student.
A three-tiered approach can provide another useful framework. Such approaches generally combine universal prevention, targeted interventions for students experiencing difficulties, and more intensive support for students with significant needs.
Challenges in Implementing School-Based Support
Although comprehensive support systems can be effective, schools may face practical challenges. Eklund et al. (2020) discuss the expanding role of school psychologists in providing mental and behavioral health services and the demands placed on school-based professionals.
Limited staffing, insufficient access to mental health professionals, and high student-to-counselor ratios can make it difficult to provide individualized support. Schools may therefore need to strengthen multidisciplinary teams and improve access to qualified mental health professionals.
Additional professional development can also help counselors recognize cultural considerations, respond appropriately to self-harm disclosures, address bullying, and make ethical decisions involving confidentiality.
Ethical Balance Between Confidentiality and Safety
The central ethical lesson from Adara’s case is that confidentiality and student safety should not be viewed as completely opposing responsibilities. Both are important.
Counselors should protect student privacy whenever possible, but they must also respond appropriately when a student presents a serious risk of harm. The counselor’s responsibility is to use the least intrusive intervention that can reasonably protect the student while maintaining dignity and trust.
When disclosure is necessary, transparency is especially important. Explaining what information must be shared, who needs to receive it, and why it is being shared can help reduce feelings of betrayal.
Conclusion
Adara’s case demonstrates the complexity of ethical decision-making in school counseling. Hannah had a legitimate ethical responsibility to respond to Adara’s disclosure of self-harm and take appropriate steps to protect her safety. However, the situation also highlights the importance of culturally responsive counseling, careful risk assessment, limited disclosure, and collaborative intervention.
A stronger response would address both the immediate safety concern and the underlying bullying and social isolation affecting Adara. By involving appropriate professionals, communicating openly with the student, addressing bullying, and providing ongoing support, school counselors can protect students while working to preserve the trust that makes counseling effective.
Ultimately, ethical school counseling requires more than following a single rule. It requires counselors to consider student safety, confidentiality, cultural identity, professional standards, and the individual circumstances of each case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main ethical issue in Adara’s case?
The main ethical issue is balancing Adara’s right to confidentiality with Hannah’s responsibility to protect her from potential self-harm. Because Adara disclosed thoughts of self-harm, Hannah needed to take appropriate safety measures while limiting unnecessary disclosure of confidential information.
Was Hannah ethically justified in telling Adara’s parents?
Hannah may have been ethically justified in involving Adara’s parents because the disclosure involved potential self-harm. However, the appropriateness of the response depends on the level of risk, applicable laws and school policies, and how the disclosure was handled. The counselor should generally involve the student in the process whenever doing so does not increase the risk of harm.
How should a school counselor handle a student’s disclosure of self-harm?
The counselor should take the disclosure seriously, assess or arrange an appropriate assessment of the student’s immediate safety, follow school and professional protocols, consult qualified professionals when necessary, and connect the student with appropriate support. Emergency intervention is necessary when there is an immediate danger.
Why is cultural competence important in Adara’s case?
Cultural competence helps counselors understand how a student’s cultural and religious identity may influence their experiences, relationships, help-seeking behavior, and perception of counseling. In Adara’s case, understanding her Muslim-American identity can help Hannah avoid assumptions and provide more respectful, individualized support.
How can counselors address bullying and cyberbullying?
Counselors can work with students, families, teachers, administrators, and mental health professionals to document and address bullying. Prevention education, early intervention, student support, clear reporting procedures, and ongoing monitoring can help reduce the effects of bullying and cyberbullying.
What is the relationship between bullying and self-harm?
Persistent bullying and cyberbullying can contribute to emotional distress, social isolation, and other mental health concerns. When a student experiencing bullying reports thoughts of self-harm, the counselor should treat the disclosure as a serious safety concern while also addressing the bullying that may be contributing to the student’s distress.
What ethical principles apply to school counseling confidentiality?
Confidentiality is an important part of the counseling relationship, but it has limits when there is a serious risk of harm. Professional ethical standards generally require counselors to balance privacy with their responsibility to protect students and comply with applicable legal and institutional requirements.
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Eklund, K., DeMarchena, S. L., Rossen, E., Izumi, J. T., Vaillancourt, K., & Rader Kelly, S. (2020). Examining the role of school psychologists as providers of mental and behavioral health services. Psychology in the Schools, 57(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22323
Laletas, S. (2019). Ethical decision making for professional school counselors: Use of practice-based models in secondary school settings. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 47(3), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1474341
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 An Ethical Analysis of a Case Study
Mayworm, A. M., & Sharkey, J. D. (2014). Ethical considerations in a three-tiered approach to school discipline policy and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21782
Smith, L. J. (2015). Minors’ right to confidentiality: Addressing the issue of bullying and the ethical obligation to prevent harm. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(7), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2015.1032649
Stone, C., & Zirkel, P. (2010). School counselor advocacy: When law and ethics may collide. Professional School Counseling, 13(4), 244–247. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.244