PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 4 Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Student Name

Capella University

PHI FPX 3200 Ethics in Health Care

Prof. Name

Date

Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Organ transplantation can be lifesaving, but the number of patients needing transplants continues to exceed the supply of donated organs. Organ conscription obtaining organs from deceased individuals without explicit prior permission has been proposed as one possible response to this shortage. However, the approach raises significant ethical questions involving autonomy, consent, dignity, justice, family rights, and equitable access to transplantation. Any policy that changes how organs are procured must therefore balance the goal of increasing organ availability with the obligation to respect individuals and protect vulnerable populations.

Ethical Concerns Surrounding Organ Conscription

Organ transplantation provides an important treatment option for people experiencing severe or irreversible organ failure. Despite advances in transplantation medicine, donor-organ shortages mean that many patients remain on waiting lists for extended periods. Kidneys, livers, hearts, lungs, and pancreases are among the organs most commonly transplanted in the United States (American Transplant Foundation, 2019).

Organ conscription is ethically controversial because it changes the relationship between individual consent and society’s interest in increasing the availability of organs. When organs are recovered without an individual’s explicit authorization, concerns arise about whether the person’s autonomy and bodily dignity have been adequately respected (Pemberton, 2022).

Another concern involves vulnerable populations. A system that relies on presumed or compulsory donation must include safeguards to ensure that people understand their rights and have meaningful opportunities to object. Without appropriate protections, questions may arise about whether individuals were adequately informed and whether their decisions were genuinely voluntary.

The ethical challenge is therefore not simply whether organ conscription could increase the number of available organs. It is also whether the policy can be implemented while protecting autonomy, maintaining public trust, and ensuring that organ allocation remains fair (Martínez-López et al., 2022).

Organ Donation Policies: Opt-In and Opt-Out Approaches

Countries use different approaches to obtaining consent for deceased organ donation. The two commonly discussed models are opt-in and opt-out systems.

Under an opt-in system, individuals actively register their decision to become organ donors. The United States has traditionally relied on an authorization-based approach in which individuals can document their donation decision through state donor registries, driver’s-license systems, or other legally recognized mechanisms. Family involvement can also be relevant depending on the circumstances and applicable state law.

An opt-out, or presumed-consent, system takes a different approach. Rather than requiring people to actively register as donors, donation may be presumed unless an individual has formally recorded an objection. However, opt-out systems differ considerably in their legal requirements and implementation, so they should not be treated as identical across countries.

Research comparing consent systems suggests that changing the default can influence donation behavior, although the effect depends on the broader healthcare system, public awareness, implementation practices, and other factors (Ahmad et al., 2019; Steffel et al., 2019).

Fairness and Justice in Organ Allocation

Fairness is another central ethical issue in organ transplantation. Because donated organs are scarce, healthcare systems must establish criteria for determining who receives available organs. These decisions involve medical urgency, compatibility, expected benefit, waiting time, and other factors established by transplantation policies.

Financial circumstances can also influence access to transplantation-related care. Patients may face barriers involving insurance coverage, transportation, evaluation requirements, geographic location, or access to specialized transplant centers. These factors can contribute to disparities even when allocation policies are designed to be equitable.

An ethical organ-transplantation system should therefore address both organ procurement and organ allocation. Increasing the number of available organs does not by itself resolve questions about whether those organs are distributed fairly.

Why Consent Matters in Organ Donation

Consent is a fundamental principle in medical ethics because it protects an individual’s right to make decisions concerning their own body. In organ donation, consent provides a mechanism for individuals to express whether they want their organs to be considered for transplantation after death.

Respect for autonomy means that individuals should have meaningful opportunities to understand donation policies and communicate their preferences. Ethical concerns become particularly significant when organs are recovered contrary to a person’s clearly expressed wishes.

Different countries use different legal definitions of consent, but the ethical importance of respecting individual decision-making remains relevant across these systems (Childress, 2022). Clear communication, accessible donor-registration systems, and transparent policies can help individuals make informed decisions about donation.

What Happens When Donor Consent Is Absent?

When donor consent is unclear or unavailable, ethical and practical problems can arise. Family members may experience emotional distress when asked to make decisions during an already difficult period. Disagreement between relatives can also complicate the donation process.

The absence of clear consent may also affect public confidence in the transplantation system. People may become less willing to register as donors if they believe their preferences will not be respected.

For this reason, policies concerning deceased organ donation should clearly establish how consent is documented, how objections are handled, and what role families have in the donation process. Transparent procedures can help protect autonomy while reducing uncertainty for healthcare professionals and families.

Strategies to Increase Public Acceptance of Organ Donation

Increasing the supply of donated organs does not necessarily require removing individual choice. Public education and improved donation infrastructure can also play important roles.

Effective strategies may include:

• Educating the public about how organ donation works.
• Providing accessible donor-registration systems.
• Encouraging individuals to discuss donation preferences with family members.
• Addressing cultural and religious concerns through community engagement.
• Improving communication between hospitals and organ procurement organizations.
• Providing clear information about how donated organs are allocated.
• Evaluating whether changes to consent defaults are appropriate within a particular healthcare system.

Public education is especially important because misconceptions about organ donation can influence people’s willingness to register. Family discussions can also help ensure that relatives understand an individual’s wishes when donation decisions arise (Delgado et al., 2019).

Alternative Policies for Increasing Organ Availability

Organ shortages have encouraged policymakers and researchers to consider alternatives to traditional donation systems. One approach is changing the default from explicit authorization to presumed consent, while still providing individuals with a meaningful opportunity to decline donation.

Another possibility is improving the efficiency of existing donation systems. Better identification of potential donors, improved hospital coordination, advances in organ preservation, and more effective communication with families may increase the number of organs available for transplantation.

Financial incentives have also been proposed in discussions about organ donation. However, creating markets for human organs raises additional ethical concerns involving exploitation, commodification, informed consent, and socioeconomic inequality. Because of these concerns, financial incentives require careful ethical and legal consideration.

Consequences of Continued Organ Shortages

The shortage of donor organs has serious consequences for patients and healthcare systems. Individuals waiting for transplantation may experience worsening illness, reduced quality of life, or death while waiting for an appropriate organ.

Long waiting periods can also increase healthcare costs because patients may require ongoing medical treatment while they wait. In some circumstances, organ shortages can contribute to interest in transplant tourism or illegal organ markets, which may expose vulnerable individuals to exploitation and unsafe medical practices.

Addressing the shortage therefore requires more than simply increasing the number of registered donors. Policymakers must consider the entire transplantation system, including donor identification, consent, organ preservation, allocation, and long-term patient outcomes (Lewis et al., 2020; Sunjaya & Sunjaya, 2019).

Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Whether organ conscription is ethically acceptable depends on how consent, autonomy, justice, and safeguards are defined and implemented. Supporters may argue that policies designed to increase organ availability could help address preventable deaths caused by donor shortages. Critics, however, emphasize that recovering organs without explicit authorization can conflict with individual autonomy and undermine trust.

A policy that changes the default for organ donation is not necessarily equivalent to taking organs without any opportunity for refusal. Presumed-consent systems, for example, generally provide mechanisms through which individuals can record an objection. The ethical assessment therefore depends heavily on the specific legal framework, transparency, safeguards, and practical implementation.

The central ethical question is how healthcare systems can increase access to lifesaving transplantation while preserving respect for individual choices and ensuring equitable treatment.

Conclusion

Organ transplantation can save lives, but persistent donor shortages create difficult ethical and policy challenges. Organ conscription has been proposed as one way to increase the supply of transplantable organs, yet it raises important concerns about autonomy, consent, dignity, family involvement, justice, and public trust.

Alternative strategies include improving donor registration, strengthening public education, encouraging family discussions, improving hospital and organ-procurement infrastructure, and evaluating consent policies such as opt-out systems. Ultimately, an ethical transplantation system must balance the urgent need for more organs with meaningful respect for individual preferences and equitable access to transplantation.

References

Ahmad, M. U., Hanna, A., Mohamed, A.-Z., Schlindwein, A., Pley, C., Bahner, I., Mhaskar, R., Pettigrew, G. J., & Jarmi, T. (2019). A systematic review of opt-out versus opt-in consent on deceased organ donation and transplantation (2006–2016). World Journal of Surgery, 43(12), 3161–3171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05118-4

American Transplant Foundation. (2019). Organ donation and transplantation. https://www.americantransplantfoundation.org/

Childress, J. F. (2022). Robert Veatch’s transplantation ethics: Obtaining and allocating organs from deceased persons. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-022-09574-3

Costa-Font, J., Rudisill, C., & Salcher-Konrad, M. (2020). “Relative consent” or “presumed consent”? Organ donation attitudes and behaviour. The European Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01214-8

DeCamp, M., Snyder Sulmasy, L., & Fins, J. J. (2022). Point: Does normothermic regional perfusion violate the ethical principles underlying organ procurement? Yes. Chest, 162(2), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.012

PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 4 Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Delgado, J., Molina-Pérez, A., Shaw, D., & Rodríguez-Arias, D. (2019). The role of the family in deceased organ procurement: A guide for clinicians and policymakers. Transplantation, 103(5), e112–e118. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002622

Gogineni, S. (2022). Organ procurement: An ethical analysis in relation to Emanuel and Emanuel’s four models. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ksuhonors1652113520724472

Golden, L. E. (2022). Considerations on the relationship between living organ donor and recipient. In Transplant Psychiatry (pp. 297–300). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15052-4_39

Hutchinson, E. F., Kramer, B., Billings, B. K., Brits, D. M., & Pather, N. (2020). The law, ethics and body donation: A tale of two bequeathal programs. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1922

Lewis, A., Koukoura, A., Tsianos, G.-I., Gargavanis, A. A., Nielsen, A. A., & Vassiliadis, E. (2021). Organ donation in the US and Europe: The supply vs. demand imbalance. Transplantation Reviews, 35(2), 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2020.100585

Madden, S., Collett, D., Walton, P., Empson, K., Forsythe, J., Ingham, A., Morgan, K., Murphy, P., Neuberger, J., & Gardiner, D. (2020). The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system. Anaesthesia, 75(9), 1146–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15055

PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 4 Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Martínez-López, M. V., Díaz-Cobacho, G., Liedo, B., Rueda, J., & Molina-Pérez, A. (2022). Beyond the altruistic donor: Embedding solidarity in organ procurement policies. Philosophies, 7(5), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7050107

Neizer, H., Singh, G. B., Gupta, S., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Addressing donor-organ shortages using extended criteria in lung transplantation. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 9(1), 49–50. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2019.10.01

Pemberton, D. (2023). Biographical lives and organ conscription. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 44(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-022-09603-1

Purwaningsih, S. N. (2020). Organ transplant agreement between donor and recipient by notary. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.119

Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Tannenbaum, D. (2019). Does changing defaults save lives? Effects of presumed consent organ donation policies. Behavioral Science & Policy, 5(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2019.0005

Sunjaya, A. F., & Sunjaya, A. P. (2019). Combating donor organ shortage: Organ care system prolonging organ storage time and improving the outcome of heart transplantations. Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 2019, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9482797

Zambrano, A. (2023). Organ conscription and greater needs. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318012200055X