NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 4 Intervention Proposal
Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX4905 Capstone Project for Nursing
Prof. Name
Date
Intervention Proposal
The Longevity Center is a specialized healthcare facility focusing on regenerative medicine. Its services include hormone therapy, preventive care, and advanced diagnostics tailored to patients seeking proactive, personalized wellness solutions. A major challenge observed at the site involves diagnostic delays, particularly in complex cases where early identification is essential for successful treatment outcomes (Sierra et al., 2021). This proposal introduces a structured intervention strategy aimed at minimizing diagnostic delays by utilizing workflow redesign and health information technology.
Identification of the Practice Issue
Delays in diagnosis are common when patients present with multiple symptoms that lack clear clinical pathways. Such delays significantly hinder treatment planning, particularly in regenerative medicine, where prompt identification of conditions like hormonal imbalances, micronutrient deficiencies, or autoimmune triggers determines the success of therapies such as stem cell infusions, peptide protocols, or bioidentical hormone replacement (Sierra et al., 2021).
Investigations into current practices revealed that the delays stem primarily from:
| Problem Identified | Impact |
|---|---|
| Fragmented communication among staff | Prolonged result interpretation |
| Lack of prioritization protocols | Missed or late intervention |
| No structured system for urgent labs | Reduced effectiveness of regenerative therapies |
Timely and structured diagnostics are therefore critical for enhancing patient outcomes.
Current Practice
At present, The Longevity Center operates with paper-based intake forms and manual transfer of data into the Electronic Health Record (EHR). This outdated process raises the risk of information loss and diagnostic delays. Laboratory results are reviewed manually without a systematic alert mechanism for abnormal findings, and there is no Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) in place to streamline prioritization (Sierra et al., 2021).
Additionally, staff members follow non-standardized workflows, creating inconsistencies in care. This is particularly concerning in regenerative medicine, where therapies like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and hormonal optimization rely heavily on precise and timely diagnostic input.
Proposed Strategy
To address the identified gaps, the proposal suggests introducing:
- A standardized diagnostic intake system
- Integration of a CDSS within the EHR
This approach directly addresses the issues of intake variability, delayed lab interpretation, and unstructured decision-making (Wolfien et al., 2023).
Key Components of the Strategy
| Intervention | Details | Expected Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Digital intake documentation | Full capture of patient history, red flags, and baseline data entered into EHR | Streamlined patient information flow |
| CDSS integration | Automated flagging of abnormal results with evidence-based recommendations | Faster, safer diagnostics |
| Staff training | Education on standardized workflows and digital intake procedures | Improved adherence and consistency |
| Interprofessional huddles | Regular discussions on CDSS alerts and lab results | Enhanced communication and teamwork |
This strategy assumes that staff will be adequately trained, technology will be gradually adopted, and communication will be optimized to support patient-centered regenerative care (Klein, 2025).
Impact on Quality, Safety, and Cost
The intervention is expected to significantly improve the quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness of care at The Longevity Center.
Anticipated Outcomes
| Dimension | Impact of Intervention | Examples in Regenerative Care |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | Standardized documentation and CDSS support ensure accurate diagnoses | PRP readiness, hormone level assessments |
| Safety | Alerts for critical lab values reduce missed diagnoses | Abnormal cytokine or hormone imbalance detection |
| Cost | Prevents unnecessary testing and emergency interventions | Savings of \$100–\$500 per test and up to \$15,000 per acute episode |
By addressing diagnostic delays, patient satisfaction is expected to rise due to timely, individualized care plans.
Role of Technology
Technology is central to this plan, specifically through CDSS integration within the EHR. This innovation provides real-time alerts, differential diagnosis support, and automated follow-up reminders (Derksen et al., 2025).
How Technology Improves Care
- Data Integration: Consolidates lab values and patient histories into one system.
- Error Reduction: Reduces cognitive overload and human error.
- Collaboration: Shared dashboards enhance interdisciplinary communication.
- Analytics: Tracks diagnostic patterns to improve long-term workflows.
This system ensures that regenerative therapies like stem cell treatments, PRP, and hormone optimization are supported with accurate, evidence-based diagnostic data.
Implementation at Practicum Site
Implementation requires a phased approach to minimize disruption.
Phases of Implementation
| Phase | Activity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot | Small-scale rollout of standardized intake and CDSS | Test workflows and gather feedback |
| Training | Interactive sessions with staff | Build confidence and competence |
| Expansion | Clinic-wide adoption | Ensure consistency in regenerative care |
| Evaluation | Monitor outcomes, safety, and efficiency | Refine and sustain improvements |
Challenges such as staff resistance and budget constraints may arise. These can be addressed through leadership support, external grants, and IT partnerships (Makhni & Hennekes, 2023).
Interprofessional Collaboration
The success of this strategy depends on team-based collaboration.
Team Roles
| Team Member | Role in Intervention |
|---|---|
| Physicians | Define diagnostic criteria and oversee treatment pathways |
| Nurse Practitioners/Nurses | Standardize intake processes and ensure accurate patient histories |
| IT Specialists | Customize and integrate CDSS within EHR |
| Administrative Staff | Coordinate training and monitor compliance |
Daily huddles supported by a shared dashboard will further enhance communication, ensuring accurate decision-making in regenerative therapies (Hermerén, 2021).
Conclusion
This intervention, centered on standardized intake and CDSS integration, aims to eliminate diagnostic delays, enhance safety, and reduce costs at The Longevity Center. With a phased rollout, interprofessional teamwork, and technological support, this strategy aligns with evidence-based practice and reflects the BSN nurse’s role in leading sustainable healthcare improvements.
References
Derksen, C., Walter, F. M., Akbar, A. B., Parmar, A. V. E., Saunders, T. S., Round, T., Rubin, G., & Scott, S. E. (2025). The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: Systematic review and recommendations. Implementation Science, 20(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01445-4
Ghasroldasht, M. M., Seok, J., Park, H.-S., Liakath Ali, F. B., & Al-Hendy, A. (2022). Stem cell therapy: From idea to clinical practice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052850
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 4 Intervention Proposal
Hermerén, G. (2021). The ethics of regenerative medicine. Biologia Futura, 72(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-021-00075-3
Khalil, C., Saab, A., Rahme, J., Bouaud, J., & Seroussi, B. (2025). Capabilities of computerized decision support systems supporting the nursing process in hospital settings: A scoping review. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03272-w
Klein, N. J. (2025). Patient blood management through electronic health record [EHR] optimization (pp. 147–168). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81666-6_9
Makhni, E. C., & Hennekes, M. E. (2023). The use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice and clinical decision making. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 31(20), 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00040
Sierra, Á., Kim, K. H., Morente, G., & Santiago, S. (2021). Cellular human tissue-engineered skin substitutes investigated for deep and difficult to heal injuries. Regenerative Medicine, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00144-0
White, N., Carter, H. E., Borg, D. N., Brain, D. C., Tariq, A., Abell, B., Blythe, R., & McPhail, S. M. (2023). Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: A scoping review and recommendations for future practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(6), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad040
Wolfien, M., Ahmadi, N., Fitzer, K., Grummt, S., Heine, K.-L., Jung, I.-C., Krefting, D., Kuhn, A. N., Peng, Y., Reinecke, I., Scheel, J., Schmidt, T., Schmücker, P., Schüttler, C., Waltemath, D., Zoch, M., & Sedlmayr, M. (2023). Ten topics to get started in medical informatics research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45948. https://doi.org/10.2196/45948
Cowan, R., Harland, L., & Yusof, M. M. (2024). Improving diagnostic pathways using digital health innovations: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10872-9
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 4 Intervention Proposal
Greenhalgh, T., Rosen, R., & Shaw, S. (2021). Digital transformation in healthcare: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ, 372, n110. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n110
Jones, D., Murphy, K., & McCormack, B. (2022). Nursing leadership in implementing evidence-based practice: Overcoming barriers to change. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(5), 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13562
Lester, C. A., Patel, V., & Frankel, A. (2020). Clinical decision support systems and diagnostic safety: Opportunities for improving patient outcomes. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009754
Topol, E. J. (2023). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 29(3), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02242-6
Vawdrey, D. K., & Hripcsak, G. (2024). Reducing diagnostic errors through EHR optimization and decision support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad089