Skip to main content

BSN Writing Services

BSN Writing Services

Call Us

+1-(612) 208-2686

Our Email

contact@bsnwritingservices.com

NR 305 Week 8 Discussion

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on End-of-Life Care Caring for elderly individuals has been a significant part of my adult life, and I have come to understand that death is an inevitable part of the human experience. As the body approaches the end of life, common symptoms—such as dry mouth and cracked lips—can make eating and drinking difficult. Respiratory distress, particularly in individuals with conditions such as severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) combined with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), can persist for days or weeks, making the final stages of life both physically and emotionally challenging for patients and families alike. The natural process of organ failure in aging bodies often causes physical weakness and emotional strain for the family, especially for those without prior experience in end-of-life care. Acceptance of death can be an emotional journey, and comfort measures—such as palliative medications and supportive care—can help improve quality of life in the final days. From my experience, many passing moments I have witnessed have been peaceful. Personal Experience with End-of-Life Care One of the most impactful moments in my life was witnessing the passing of Jane, a woman from my village. Jane was a mother to one daughter, who stayed by her side during the last two days of her life. During this period, no visitors came, and the daughter faced the emotional difficulty of witnessing her mother’s final moments. After her mother’s passing, she experienced profound grief, struggling to move forward. This experience reinforced my understanding that for individuals with strong spiritual beliefs, acceptance of death can sometimes be easier. Spirituality may provide a framework for understanding loss, offering comfort and resilience. Conversely, those without such beliefs may find the process more distressing. The Role of Advance Planning in Reducing Family Burden Advance care planning—such as discussing treatment preferences, hospice care options, and spiritual needs—can significantly ease the burden on families. When patients and families make decisions before the final stages, they can focus on spending meaningful time together rather than navigating urgent and stressful choices. Nurses and other healthcare providers play a crucial role in facilitating these conversations, ensuring that both the patient’s wishes and the family’s needs are respected. Emotional Impact on Families The emotional toll of end-of-life situations can be profound. Families often experience a mixture of emotions—shock, disbelief, guilt, anger, and deep sadness. These reactions are a natural part of the grieving process. Compassionate care from healthcare workers can help guide families through this period, providing emotional support, grief counseling, and resources to cope. Communication and Support During COVID-19 The COVID-19 pandemic introduced additional challenges to end-of-life care. With strict visitor restrictions in hospitals and long-term care facilities, many families were unable to be physically present with loved ones during their final days. This separation has amplified emotional distress and complicated the grieving process. Healthcare providers had to adapt by using virtual communication methods to connect patients with their families, ensuring emotional closeness despite physical barriers. Table: Common Challenges in End-of-Life Care and Supportive Strategies Challenge Impact Possible Supportive Strategies Physical symptoms (dry mouth, breathlessness) Discomfort and reduced quality of life Palliative medications, hydration support, oxygen therapy Emotional distress in families Anxiety, grief, inability to cope Counseling services, bereavement support groups Lack of prior experience with death Uncertainty in decision-making Advance care planning, family education Visitor restrictions (COVID-19) Emotional isolation of patient Virtual visits, increased nursing presence Spiritual or existential distress Difficulty in accepting death Spiritual counseling, pastoral care services Responses To Robin Elliott Hello, Robin. I sincerely appreciate your contribution to this week’s discussion. I am deeply sorry for your loss. Experiencing the death of both parents in close succession is unimaginably difficult. The emotions you described—ranging from shock and disbelief to guilt and overwhelming grief—are entirely valid and reflect the intense impact of such loss. Your openness in sharing this experience can help others understand the importance of emotional support during bereavement. To Colin Herndon Hello, Herndon. Thank you for your thoughtful response. You are correct in noting how the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the way end-of-life care is delivered worldwide. The restrictions on visitors have profoundly affected both patients and their loved ones, adding emotional strain to an already difficult time. I agree with you that finding ways to maintain patient-family connections—whether through technology or increased healthcare staff engagement—is essential in preserving dignity and comfort during these moments. References World Health Organization. (2020). Integrating palliative care and symptom relief into responses to humanitarian emergencies and crises. WHO. Connor, S. R. (2020). Hospice and palliative care: The essential guide. Routledge. NR 305 Week 8 Discussion National Institute on Aging. (2021). Providing comfort at the end of life. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/providing-comfort-end-life

NR 305 Week 7 Debriefing the Week 6 Head to Toe Assessment Assignment

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date Week 7: Debriefing the Week 6 Head-to-Toe Assessment Assignment 1. Please share how physical assessment is performed in your practice area. How do you determine what type of physical assessment is appropriate in caring for your patients? Do you perform complete head-to-toe assessments, or are they typically more focused exams? In my current role as a nurse, my responsibilities do not include conducting full physical assessments. Instead, I focus primarily on evaluating the social, financial, and educational needs of our insurance members. This includes linking patients to community programs, arranging access to medication resources, and offering education on medical diagnoses and diagnostic tests. Prior to my current position, I worked as the sole RN in a busy primary care practice with three medical assistants and one nurse. In that role, physical assessments were more focused examinations rather than complete head-to-toe evaluations. My responsibilities included: NR 305 Week 7 Debriefing the Week 6 Head to Toe Assessment Assignment Task Details Initial Patient Intake Assessed chief complaints, reviewed vital signs, addressed medication concerns. Diabetes Care Reviewed blood sugar logs, examined feet for skin or vascular changes, and performed monofilament testing to check sensation. Skin Assessment Identified wounds, rashes, or abnormal changes and communicated findings to the physician. Patient Education Provided training on glucometers, insulin pens, inhalers, nebulizers, and other medical devices. Nursing Visits Performed dressing changes, administered injections, and conducted targeted education sessions. I also coordinated referrals, most often to home care services, and maintained vigilant observation for discrepancies between a patient’s subjective reports and my objective findings. As Lockhart and Davis (2014) highlight, not all healthcare scenarios require a traditional approach, which is especially true in primary care settings where patient visits are often focused on wellness checks, medication refills, or acute issues. 2. Based on your observations, do you feel that patient assessments performed in practice are as thorough as they should be? Explain your answer. From my experience, the level of thoroughness in patient assessments is generally appropriate for the primary care environment. Given the time constraints and the specific reasons for patient visits, the focus is usually on the most pressing clinical concerns. However, maintaining an alert and critical mindset is essential, as objective findings may sometimes contradict what patients report. For instance, in diabetes care, routine foot checks are critical, yet research shows many individuals do not regularly inspect their own feet (Saraiva Lucoveis, Antar Gamba, Boccara de Paula, & da Silva Morita, 2018). In such cases, the nurse’s role in early detection becomes even more crucial. 3. Reflect on the assessment you performed for the video assignment. Perhaps you might compare your performance now to how it might have been different when you were a brand-new nurse? Or share something you learned (or were reminded of) by participating in this activity? Completing the video assignment was an eye-opening experience. Although I have been a nurse since 2004 and have performed countless assessments, I found myself feeling anxious due to the pressure of grading and the challenge of recalling every required step. I had not conducted a complete head-to-toe physical assessment in over six years, so certain anatomical landmarks—such as Erb’s point and lymph node locations—required review. Recording the assignment three times underscored the performance pressure I felt: When I was a nursing student, I was often nervous about harming patients and struggled to narrate my actions during assessments. Over the years, I gained confidence through experience and by mentoring new nurses. While my current role focuses more on social determinants of health than direct patient care, the assignment reminded me that compassion and attentiveness remain core nursing skills. This exercise reinforced the value of periodic skill refreshers, especially for nurses who transition into non-clinical roles. It also highlighted that clear communication, empathy, and critical observation are just as important as technical proficiency. References Lockhart, L., & Davis, C. (2014). Caring for nontraditional families. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy, 12(6), 14–19. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=99041601&site=eds-live&scope=site NR 305 Week 7 Debriefing the Week 6 Head to Toe Assessment Assignment Saraiva Lucoveis, M. do L., Antar Gamba, M., Boccara de Paula, M. A., & da Silva Morita, A. B. P. (2018). Degree of risk for foot ulcer due to diabetes: Nursing assessment. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71(6), 3041–3047. https://doi-org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0586

NR 305 Week 6 Course Project Milestone

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date Understanding Kidney Disease: Managing Hypertension for Healthier Kidneys Hypertension, often referred to as high blood pressure, is one of the most significant yet preventable contributors to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Its long-term impact on vascular health can progressively impair kidney function, making early intervention and consistent management essential. Although lifestyle modifications and medical therapy can effectively control hypertension, failure to address it may result in irreversible damage to the kidneys and other vital organs. This discussion explores the physiological connection between hypertension and kidney disease, outlines diagnostic and management strategies, and presents an actionable care plan based on the case study of JD—a client facing a heightened risk of kidney complications due to uncontrolled blood pressure. Chronic Hypertension as a Risk Factor for Kidney Disease Chronic hypertension exerts continuous stress on blood vessels, particularly those in the kidneys, reducing their efficiency in filtering waste from the bloodstream. If left unmanaged, it can result in structural damage, including narrowing or thickening of the renal arteries, which reduces blood flow. Over time, these vascular changes contribute to fluid retention, swelling (edema), shortness of breath from pulmonary fluid accumulation, and metabolic imbalances that may cause symptoms such as fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. In JD’s case, despite lacking a family history of kidney disease, his high cholesterol levels and persistent hypertension place him at substantial risk. This underlines the importance of proactive screening and early interventions, even for individuals without genetic predispositions. Link Between Hypertension and Kidney Disease How Does Hypertension Damage the Kidneys? Uncontrolled high blood pressure damages the small, delicate vessels (glomeruli) within the kidneys. As these vessels deteriorate, the kidneys lose their ability to filter toxins and excess fluid, resulting in a dangerous cycle of worsening hypertension and kidney function decline. This damage is progressive and often asymptomatic until advanced stages, making regular monitoring vital. Clinical consequences of hypertensive kidney damage include: Populations at Higher Risk Individuals with certain health conditions or demographic backgrounds face a higher risk of developing kidney disease secondary to hypertension. The table below summarizes these high-risk populations and their associated risk factors. Table 1 Populations with Increased Risk for Hypertensive Kidney Damage Population/Condition Risk Factors Relevance to JD Diabetes patients Microvascular damage accelerating kidney function decline. JD does not have diabetes, but shares vascular risk factors. Hypertension Chronic vascular stress impairing renal circulation. JD’s uncontrolled hypertension is the primary risk factor. Cardiovascular disease Reduced kidney perfusion from compromised heart function. JD’s high cholesterol increases cardiovascular strain. African American ethnicity Higher prevalence of severe hypertension and faster progression to ESRD. JD is not African American, but ethnic disparities highlight prevention urgency. Family history of kidney disease Genetic predisposition to renal insufficiency. No known family history, but lifestyle factors still significant. Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Disease Diagnostic Measures Early detection of kidney damage requires a combination of physical assessment, laboratory evaluation, and imaging studies: Interventions for Hypertension Management A multidisciplinary approach is essential for controlling blood pressure and protecting kidney function. Evidence-based interventions include: Teaching Plan and Evaluation Structured Teaching Plan for JD Focus Area Action Steps Purpose Blood Pressure Monitoring Measure and record BP twice daily using a digital monitor linked to an online portal. Enables continuous assessment and timely adjustments. Health Data Logging Record meals, exercise routines, and medication adherence in a mobile app. Supports self-management and identifies patterns. Support Systems Connect with a nutritionist, join fitness groups, and explore smoking cessation resources if applicable. Encourages sustained lifestyle change. Evaluation of Progress Progress will be measured through: Regular follow-ups will allow for adjustment of the treatment plan and referral to specialists if needed. Conclusion Hypertension is both a preventable and treatable risk factor for kidney disease, yet it remains one of the most common causes of CKD worldwide. For patients like JD, integrating lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and digital health tools can dramatically lower the risk of kidney damage. Proactive monitoring, coupled with individualized education and support, forms the foundation for preserving kidney health and overall well-being. References Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. McLean, G., et al. (2015). Digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with hypertension: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11), e264. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4648 NR 305 Week 6 Course Project Milestone Schub, T. B. (2018). Hypertension and kidney disease. CINAHL Nursing Guide. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nup&AN=T703239&site=eds-live National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. (n.d.). Identify and manage patients with chronic kidney disease. Retrieved from https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/communication-programs/nkdep/identify-manage-patients/manage-ckd NR 305 Week 6 Course Project Milestone

NR 305 Week 5 Discussion

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date Week 5 Discussion: Debriefing of Week 4 iHuman Neurovascular Assessment (Graded) Purpose The primary aim of this debriefing is to revisit and critically analyze the experiences gained from completing the Week 4 iHuman Neurovascular Assessment activity. This reflection allows for collaborative engagement with both faculty and peers. During these debriefings, students are encouraged to: Course Outcomes This debriefing activity supports the achievement of the following course outcomes: Course Outcome Description Program Outcome (PO) CO 2 Distinguish between normal and abnormal health assessment findings. PO 4 CO 3 Identify physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual factors influencing an individual’s health status. PO 1 CO 4 Apply effective communication techniques during health assessments and documentation. PO 3 Due Date Points Possible This discussion is valued at 50 points. Directions Debriefing requires reflective thinking about personal experiences in the virtual simulation. Students are expected to: Best Practices: Debriefing: Week 4 iHuman Neurovascular Assessment (Athena Washington Case) What went well during the simulation? Throughout the simulation, I noticed increased ease in navigating the iHuman platform compared to previous weeks. Although neurovascular assessments are not my strongest area due to limited clinical exposure, completing the preparatory work beforehand improved my confidence. The scenario felt moderately realistic; however, the patient’s brief responses added complexity to the neurological assessment process, simulating real-world challenges when obtaining a comprehensive history. My prior knowledge in related assessments enabled me to maintain a steady and systematic approach during the activity. NR 305 Week 5 Discussion What would I do differently next time? For future simulations, I plan to use a different device and web browser to prevent the technical difficulties I encountered—such as malfunctioning audio and incomplete blood pressure cuff inflation. These issues were consistent with problems experienced in prior weeks, which may have impacted the immersive nature of the scenario. Surprisingly, despite my uncertainty about my neurovascular skills, my iHuman score was higher than expected. This result highlighted that my theoretical knowledge was stronger than I had assumed, though hands-on practice remains essential. What did I learn from this simulation? This experience reinforced the importance of thoroughness, patience, and methodical assessments in neurological care. I realized that much of my prior training resurfaced during the activity, giving me greater confidence in handling future neuro ICU cases. By slowing down and focusing on accuracy rather than speed, I was able to achieve a more comprehensive assessment. However, persistent technical issues with the simulation platform limited the full benefit of the exercise. This reinforces the need for adaptability in both clinical and simulated environments. References American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley. NR 305 Week 5 Discussion Jeffries, P. R. (2016). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (2nd ed.). National League for Nursing.

NR 305 Week 4 Project Course Milestone

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date Week 4: Course Project Milestone 1 (graded) Due: Monday, 12:59 a.m.Points: 225Submission Type: File upload Purpose The aim of this assignment is for the student to conduct a comprehensive health history on a willing, unrelated adult participant. The goal is to create written documentation that is both clear and accurate, reflecting professional communication skills and attention to detail. Students must ensure they select an adult participant other than themselves; failure to do so will result in a 20% grade deduction. This activity not only provides hands-on experience with health history taking but also emphasizes professional ethical practice in data collection. Participants should be informed that they are not required to share any information they wish to keep private. If the participant chooses not to disclose certain details, the student should record “Does not want to disclose.” If key information is repeatedly omitted, the student should find another participant who is more willing to share the necessary details. Course Outcomes This project allows students to achieve the following course outcomes: Points and Due Date The Health History Milestone 1 assignment is worth 225 points and must be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4. Students with questions should post them in the Q & A Forum for class-wide visibility. Disclaimer This assignment focuses on written communication of client information, not performing a physical examination. Accuracy in recording health history is essential. Medical terminology should be precise, and subjective descriptors such as “frequently,” “normal,” “improved,” or “within normal limits (WNL)” should be avoided. Instead, students should use quantifiable or descriptive data, for example, “three times per day” instead of “frequently.” Assignment Directions The following table outlines the step-by-step requirements for the project: Step Instructions 1 Identify a non-related adult who consents to a health history interview. 2 Download the required NR305_Milestone1_Form and complete all sections directly in the document. 3 Use Microsoft Word 2013 or later (PC) or Office 2011 or later (Mac). Save as .docx format. 4 Review Chapter 4 in your textbook for documentation examples. 5 Avoid vague descriptors; use specific data to record observations. 6 Save the file with your last name in the title (e.g., NR305_Milestone1_Form_Smith). 7 Submit by the deadline and post any questions in the Q & A Forum. Academic Integrity Reminder By submitting this assignment, students affirm that the work is original, appropriately cited, and completed without unauthorized assistance. All Chamberlain College of Nursing academic integrity guidelines must be followed. Rubric Criteria Overview The grading rubric includes multiple components, each with specific expectations. Biographical Data Students must record: Present Health History/Illness Document reasons for seeking care, current health patterns, and personal health goals. Specific, factual details are expected without generalizations. Health Beliefs and Practices Record beliefs, practices, and behaviors influencing healthcare decisions, including cultural, social, or lifestyle factors that affect health outcomes. Medications List all medications (prescription, over-the-counter, herbal) including: NR 305 Week 4 Project Course Milestone Past History Include childhood diseases, immunizations, allergies, transfusions, major illnesses, hospitalizations, surgeries, substance use history (alcohol, tobacco, drugs), injuries, and obstetric history if applicable. Emotional History Describe any known or suspected mental, emotional, or psychiatric conditions, with specific details on how they impact well-being or functioning. Family History Provide a multi-generational review, noting any patterns of illness or hereditary conditions. This should include parents, siblings, and grandparents. Psychosocial/Occupational History Document educational background, occupational history, and financial situation as they relate to health access and decision-making. Roles and Relationships Describe the individual’s key relationships, including significant others, support systems, and healthcare team interactions. Ethnicity and Culture Discuss cultural and ethnic identity along with any relevant traits or customs that influence healthcare decisions. Spirituality Identify religious or spiritual beliefs, needs, and practices relevant to health. Self-Concept Describe the participant’s self-esteem, self-worth, and future aspirations. Review of Systems Record both current and past data for each body system, including functional patterns and any symptoms reported. Clarity of Writing The submission should be well-organized, clearly written, and free from vague descriptors, spelling, or grammar errors. References Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2018). NR305: Health history guidelines and rubric. Chicago, IL: Author. Jarvis, C. (2019). Physical examination and health assessment (8th ed.). Elsevier. NR 305 Week 4 Project Course Milestone American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).

NR 305 Week 3 Assignment: Cardiovascular Assessment

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date NR305 Week 3 iHuman Nurse Notes Template Directions Before beginning this assignment, review the NR305 Week 3 assignment directions thoroughly. Complete the Week 3 Cardiovascular Assessment: Michael Granger case in iHuman, ensuring the case is submitted for grading. Two submission attempts are permitted before the deadline. Do not remove any content or questions from this template. Ensure that each item is addressed completely, using information gathered during the iHuman case as needed. Submit the completed template on the Week 3 assignment page. Grammar and spelling accuracy are part of the grading rubric. SBAR Summary of Mr. Michael Granger’s Current Health Status Situation (S) Mr. Michael Granger, a newly admitted patient, is experiencing an exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF). He reports significant shortness of breath and an approximate weight gain of 8 pounds in recent days. Background (B) The patient has a medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, and CHF. Family history reveals similar cardiovascular conditions. He is a long-term smoker, averaging one pack per day, and is currently attempting smoking cessation with nicotine patches. He has struggled with adherence to heart failure management recommendations, leading to recurrent episodes of weight gain requiring diuretic intervention. He reports sleeping with the head of the bed elevated and experiencing frequent nocturia. Assessment (A) Vital signs reveal normal blood pressure and heart rate. Oxygen saturation is 89%, with supplemental oxygen being administered and adjusted as ordered. Lung auscultation detects coarse crackles bilaterally. Lower extremities present with 2+ pitting edema bilaterally, without edema in other regions. Recommendation (R) The patient is likely experiencing heart failure exacerbation with pulmonary edema and fluid overload. Recommended interventions include: NR 305 Week 3 Assignment: Cardiovascular Assessment Intervention Rationale Administration of diuretics Reduce fluid overload and relieve pulmonary congestion Strict sodium and fluid restriction Prevent further fluid accumulation and reduce cardiac workload Intake/output monitoring Avoid transition from fluid overload to dehydration Diagnostic chest X-ray Assess pulmonary congestion and rule out other causes of respiratory distress 12-lead ECG Evaluate for arrhythmias or ischemic changes Oxygen via nasal cannula until SpO₂ ≥ 95% Improve oxygenation and reduce dyspnea Priority Discharge Teaching Topics 1. Dietary and Lifestyle Modifications Mr. Granger should adopt a low-sodium diet, strictly avoiding processed, canned, packaged, and fried foods. Fluid intake should be monitored and limited as prescribed. Smoking cessation remains critical, as tobacco use worsens CHF outcomes (Packard et al., 2010). Daily weight monitoring should be performed for early detection of fluid retention. 2. Medication Management and Symptom Recognition Education should include correct dosing, timing, and understanding potential side effects of prescribed medications. Mr. Granger should be trained to recognize early CHF warning signs—such as sudden weight gain, increased shortness of breath, or edema—and to seek prompt medical attention. Rationale for Selected Teaching Topics The patient’s presentation of weight gain, dyspnea, and history of non-adherence to dietary recommendations indicate a need for education on nutrition, fluid restriction, and lifestyle adjustments. Past patterns of recurrent fluid overload highlight the importance of medication adherence and early symptom recognition to prevent acute exacerbations. Teaching Plan and Resources Patient education will be conducted through one-on-one discussions, supported by visual aids illustrating portion sizes, sodium content in common foods, and the relationship between fluid intake and CHF symptoms. Collaboration with a registered dietitian will provide personalized meal planning and substitution strategies for high-sodium foods. Educational handouts from the American Heart Association (AHA) will be provided, along with a daily weight log template. The patient will also receive instruction on proper use of a home blood pressure monitor and digital scale. Emphasis will be placed on self-monitoring for symptoms, including rapid weight gain (≥2–3 lbs in 24 hours or ≥5 lbs in a week), new or worsening edema, and increased fatigue. Resources such as mobile health apps for medication reminders and symptom tracking may be recommended to improve adherence (Yancy et al., 2017). References Packard, K. A., Lenz, T. L., & Destache, C. J. (2010). Teaching heart failure treatment guidelines and assessing heart failure therapy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(6), 103. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7406103 NR 305 Week 3 Assignment: Cardiovascular Assessment Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Drazner, M. H., … & Wilkoff, B. L. (2017). 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(6), 776–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.025

NR 305 Week 2 iHuman Nurse Notes Template

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date NR 305 Week 2 iHuman Nurse Notes Template SBAR Summary of Wellness Assessment Situation (S) Luciana Gonzalez attended the clinic today for a comprehensive wellness evaluation as part of her life insurance application process through her employer. Background (B) The patient reported experiencing urinary frequency, pain, and discomfort over the past several days. She noted a history of similar episodes in the past but denied any known allergies. Ms. Gonzalez is not currently taking any medications. She reported no history of alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, or recreational drug use. Assessment (A) Physical examination revealed a nevus on the right side of her face, with no concerning changes in size, shape, or color. Vital signs were stable: height 5’4” (162.5 cm), weight 185 lbs (83.9 kg), blood pressure 124/82 mmHg, respiratory rate 22 breaths per minute (non-labored), oxygen saturation 98% on room air, and temperature 98.8°F (37.1°C). She was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation (A&O ×4). Ms. Gonzalez reported mild pain (2/10) and discomfort during urination. Urinalysis results showed bacteriuria, although the urine was clear, without hematuria, pus, or evidence of kidney stones. Recommendations (R) It is recommended that the patient increase fluid intake to help dilute urine and facilitate bacterial clearance. She should be counseled on proper perineal hygiene, specifically wiping from front to back, to reduce the risk of bacterial transmission. A follow-up with a primary care provider for a urine culture is advised to confirm the diagnosis and determine the most effective treatment plan for urinary tract infection (UTI) management. Additional Assessment Questions for Ms. Gonzalez No. Question Purpose 1 Do you typically wear tight-fitting underwear made from synthetic materials such as nylon, polyester, or acrylic? To assess for clothing-related risk factors that promote bacterial growth. 2 Could you describe your bathroom hygiene habits, particularly whether you wipe from front to back or back to front? To evaluate hygiene practices that may influence UTI recurrence. 3 Do you often delay urination for extended periods? To determine if urinary retention habits contribute to bacterial buildup. Rationale for Selected Questions The chosen questions aim to identify potential lifestyle and hygiene-related contributors to recurrent UTIs. Women are anatomically predisposed to UTIs due to a shorter urethra located near the vaginal and anal openings, facilitating bacterial transfer (Foxman, 2014). Holding urine for prolonged periods can allow bacteria to multiply within the bladder, while tight-fitting, non-breathable fabrics can create a warm, moist environment conducive to bacterial overgrowth (Hooton & Gupta, 2019). Identifying these factors supports tailored patient education to reduce recurrence. Priority Opportunities for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Rationale for Selected Opportunities The assessment revealed that Ms. Gonzalez demonstrated limited awareness of UTI prevention strategies and appropriate antibiotic usage. Patient education is crucial because incomplete antibiotic regimens can lead to bacterial persistence or resistance, increasing the risk of recurrent infections (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2022). Furthermore, maintaining adequate hydration helps dilute urine, reduces bacterial concentration, and supports urinary tract flushing, thereby decreasing the risk of infection progression (Mayo Clinic, 2023). Addressing these priorities can improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence risk. References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Antibiotic use: Preventing antibiotic resistance. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use Foxman, B. (2014). Urinary tract infection syndromes: Occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003 NR 305 Week 2 iHuman Nurse Notes Template Hooton, T. M., & Gupta, K. (2019). Recurrent urinary tract infection in women. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/recurrent-urinary-tract-infection-in-women Mayo Clinic. (2023). Urinary tract infection (UTI). https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/urinary-tract-infection

NR 305 Week 1 Discussion

Student Name Chamberlain University NR-305: RN Health Assessment Prof. Name Date NR305 – RN Health Assessment Week 1 Discussion Healthy People Initiative (graded) The following case study applies concepts from the Healthy People 2020 framework to assess a patient scenario in a college health setting. Case Study Overview Maria is a 40-year-old Hispanic woman in her second year of nursing school who presents with a 14-pound weight gain since starting her program. She is concerned about the effects of this weight gain on both her appearance and long-term health. She is an excellent cook, and her family enjoys traditional Hispanic meals. Maria is married with two school-age children and manages the household without additional help. She attends 15 hours of class each week, participates in 12 hours of labs and clinical, and commutes one hour each way to campus. She reports sleeping about six hours per night and considers this acceptable. 1. What additional information would you like to gather from Maria? To provide a thorough health assessment, additional information should be collected on Maria’s: Assessment Area Details to Gather Medical History Family history of obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and other chronic illnesses (Healthy People 2020, 2020). Dietary Patterns Specific foods consumed, portion sizes, cooking methods, frequency of high-fat/high-sugar meals, caffeine intake. Physical Activity Frequency, type, and duration of exercise; barriers to regular physical activity. Sleep Habits Sleep quality, bedtime routines, use of electronic devices before bed. Stress and Coping Stress management techniques, perceived stress level, presence of social and family support systems. Mental and Emotional Health Self-esteem, mood changes, emotional triggers for eating, symptoms of anxiety or depression. Occupational and Academic Load Time management strategies, impact of commuting and academic demands on daily routines. Understanding these factors can guide the creation of a culturally sensitive and realistic health plan. 2. What are Maria’s real and potential health risks? Real health risks: Potential health risks: 3. Why is Maria’s culture important when obtaining the health assessment? Maria’s Hispanic heritage plays a vital role in her dietary habits, health beliefs, and perceptions of illness. Cultural preferences influence food selection, cooking methods, and the social value placed on meals. As Jarvis (2015) notes, individuals from different cultural backgrounds may interpret symptoms and health recommendations differently. Incorporating healthier versions of traditional dishes can increase adherence to dietary changes while respecting cultural identity. Understanding her cultural context also facilitates building trust and improving communication during health counseling. 4. Pick one of Maria’s health risks. What would be one reasonable short-term goal for this risk? Chosen health risk: Overweight and obesity. Short-term goal:Maria will lose at least 1 pound per week over the next 30 days through dietary modifications and increased physical activity, as measured by weekly weigh-ins. This goal is specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound (SMART), aligning with Healthy People 2020 objectives for reducing obesity rates. 5. What nursing interventions would you incorporate into Maria’s plan of care to assist her with meeting your chosen goal? Please provide rationale for your selections. Intervention Rationale Daily Food Journal Encourages self-awareness of eating patterns and helps identify areas for nutritional improvement. Weekly Weight Tracking Provides visual feedback and motivation by showing progress over time. Cultural Meal Modifications Retains cultural identity while incorporating healthier ingredients and cooking methods. Incorporation of Moderate Physical Activity Walking or light exercise at least 30 minutes daily can counter sedentary behaviors from commuting/studying. Stress Management Education Techniques such as deep breathing, mindfulness, or brief relaxation breaks can reduce emotional eating. Sleep Hygiene Counseling Encouraging consistent bedtime and reducing caffeine intake can improve rest, aiding weight control. Additional Considerations for Leading Health Indicators Maria’s case aligns with several Healthy People 2020 Leading Health Indicators, including: NR 305 Week 1 Discussion By integrating these indicators into her care plan, the nurse can promote sustainable health behaviors tailored to Maria’s lifestyle and cultural values. References Healthy People 2020. (2020). Genomics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/genomics NR 305 Week 1 Discussion Jarvis, C. (2015). Physical examination and health assessment (7th ed.). Elsevier Saunders.